A Tale of Two Failures: Europe's Authoritarian Shift and Trump's Compromised Peace


Vance's scathing speech in Munich last week was just what the doctor ordered for a continent increasingly sliding towards authoritarianism. Unfortunately, Europe wasn't listening.

Vance began by reminding those present that the principles of liberty and free speech are common values (formerly) shared on both sides of The Atlantic, and shared his worry about Europe's retreat from such values. He told a shocked audience that Europe's greatest threat comes not from China or Russia, but from within.
While Europe has not (yet) mastered China's digital Police State nor the art of the spontaneous defenestration of dissidents, Vance fired off countless examples of State crimes against liberty across Europe, including the imprisonment of Adam Smith-Connor, the Scottish government criminalising private prayer at home and the incarceration of many more - simply for exercising their right to free speech.
This was followed by an admonishment of the German government's arrogant refusal to permit the AfD and other groups from attending the Munich conference, the cancellation of Romanian elections and the damaging impact of uncontrolled mass migration.
At a time when the spectre of war looms over the continent, Vance was apt in comparing the European Union today with the USSR during the Cold War - two organisations barely distinguishable in their disdain for free speech. Vance reminded delegates that the Soviets "𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘡 𝘣𝘦𝘀𝘒𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘡𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘯𝘦π˜ͺ𝘡𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘷𝘒𝘭𝘢𝘦π˜₯ 𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘀𝘡𝘦π˜₯ 𝘒𝘭𝘭 𝘡𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘡𝘳𝘒𝘰𝘳π˜₯π˜ͺ𝘯𝘒𝘳𝘺 𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴π˜ͺ𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘭π˜ͺ𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘡𝘺." He rightfully asked how discussions on defending Europe are to proceed when it is no longer clear what shared values the continent is supposed to be defending. "π˜›π˜©π˜¦π˜³π˜¦ π˜ͺ𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘀𝘢𝘳π˜ͺ𝘡𝘺 π˜ͺ𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘢 𝘒𝘳𝘦 𝘒𝘧𝘳𝘒π˜ͺπ˜₯ 𝘰𝘧 𝘡𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘰π˜ͺ𝘀𝘦𝘴, 𝘡𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘱π˜ͺ𝘯π˜ͺ𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘒𝘯π˜₯ 𝘡𝘩𝘦 𝘀𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘀π˜ͺ𝘦𝘯𝘀𝘦 𝘡𝘩𝘒𝘡 𝘨𝘢π˜ͺπ˜₯𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘢𝘳 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦."
Vance's barnstorming speech was a much needed and impassioned defence of liberty which should have gone down to rapturous applause in a room supposedly packed with people who share the same values.
Instead, once Vance had left the podium, Scholz replied that this timely reminder about the value of free speech and democratic institutions was "not appropriate, especially not among friends and allies." No Olaf, it is entirely appropriate, 𝘱𝘒𝘳𝘡π˜ͺ𝘀𝘢𝘭𝘒𝘳𝘭𝘺 so among friends and allies.
------
Fast forward to this week and the talks in Saudi Arabia, the Trump administration has appeared happy to also treat Putin's Russia as a friend and ally.
While Trump should be applauded for his attempts to end the war as soon as possible, the initial indicators for the chances of a just peace are worrying:
Talks have begun without Kyiv. NATO membership is already off the table and US officials have even intimated the withdrawal of American troops from The Baltics. If this is the art of the deal, offering your opponent everything they want is certainly an interesting bargaining strategy.
A leaked document seen by The Telegraph yesterday reveals plans to force Ukraine into economic serfdom, granting US interests 50% of mining profits- sums that will far outweigh the military and financial assistance that the US has so far provided to Kyiv. Musk has already publically praised the Putin regime for "competent leadership." Not particularly competent on free speech and the rule of law, Elon.
One hopes that the final deal will be more balanced. If Trump's true objective is to force Europe's hand into paying for its own defence, then so far, he is a master strategist. If he achieves peace, under who's terms and for how long? The Trump administration keeps parotting Reagan's "peace through strength." While of course we will have to wait and see what details emerge from Riyadh and subsequent talks, if the final deal looks remotely like what we've seen at the table so far- then that is not strength, but capitulation.
Not that a Ukrainian capitulation to Putin would upset everyone today. It is striking how similar the far-left and the populist right sound on the subject of Ukraine at the moment. Galloway has piped up to let us know that he doesn't consider Zelensky the legitimate president of Ukraine, while a raft of MAGA voices loyally parrot Kremlin propaganda as gospel on a daily basis.
While Ukraine is not entirely blameless (needlessly inflaming tensions by legislating against the use of the Russian language for example), to blame this conflict on Zelensky is at best ignorant, or sympomatic of a deranged belief that the violent enforcement of Putinism is preferable to an independent Ukraine. (Albeit one that naively believes the EU to be a guarantor of liberty.)
While Vance is completely correct about Europe's domestic abandonment of liberty, Trump would do well to remember that the fall of the West does not make the fascists to the East our friends.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ethnicity and migration

Image
Yesterday the Commons heard about the “collective failure” to address concerns about the ethnicity of grooming-gang members. Casey’s report states: “Child sexual exploitation is horrendous whoever commits it, but there have been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination. Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation.” For libertarians, a defendant’s ethnicity or cultural background is of no concern. Individuals are individuals; the circumstances of their birth need not dictate their own actions or how they should be treated by the state. The problem with the grooming-gang crisis—as the full inquiry will no doubt uncover—is that concerns over the ethnicity of perpetrators resulted in the shameful white-washing, victim-blaming and inaction we have seen on one of the most horrendous crimes in recent history. This is a direct result of the woke left’s dominance in our judiciary and police forces—those like L...
Read more

Free Jimmy Lai

Image
Tomorrow will see the closing arguments in the sham trial of Hong Kong democracy activist and British citizen Jimmy Lai. The 77-year-old has been kept in solitary confinement since December 2020. His preferred foreign lawyer, Tim Owen KC, was barred from representing him under new requirements of Hong Kong’s “National Security” Law, and the Department of “Justice” has systematically denied him his choice of counsel. Until December 2024, Lai was not even permitted visits from his family; the communists now allow him thirty minutes a month, through a glass screen. Before the fist of the CCP fell on Hong Kong, Lai ran Apple Daily, a pro-democracy newspaper and outspoken critic of Beijing. He joined the anti-extradition protests and funded opposition groups in his fight for freedom. His “crimes” under the Hong Kong “National Security” Law — which, in violation of international law to which the UK is a signatory, made toilet paper out of “One Country, Two Systems” and was imposed on Hong Ko...
Read more

The Penguin Lessons

Image
  What a penguin taught me about freedom: Libertarian themes in "π˜›π˜©π˜¦ π˜—π˜¦π˜―π˜¨π˜Άπ˜ͺ𝘯 π˜“π˜¦π˜΄π˜΄π˜°π˜―π˜΄" As Trump announces new tariffs on foreign films, time for a review of a new British blockbuster: In the film adaptation of Tom Michell’s gentle memoir, The Penguin Lessons, a man rescues a dying penguin from an oil spill and smuggles it across South America during the prelude to Argentina's military dictatorship. His desire for a quiet life as an English teacher at a British school in Buenos Aires is challenged when a left-leaning colleague is abducted by the security services. Decades later, Argentina would elect Javier Milei—a libertarian economist who stormed to power on a promise to “chainsaw” the very bureaucracies that suffocated the country back then. In its quiet way, Michell’s story is a perfect metaphor for the values Milei now shouts from the rooftops: personal responsibility, moral clarity, and resistance to a State that too often rewards indifference and pun...
Read more